Brahms and Schumann
John Lill - Piano
| "one of the noblest accounts on disc"
Classic FM |
| |
"this CD is an attractive purchase ... a masterpiece from a composer
... by a player who knows exactly what is
needed and delights in communicating it"
Muscal Opinion |
| |
|
"one of the greatest pianists alive
today...Unsurpassed playing. An intellectual giant and master craftsman. Beyond words"
The Glasgow Herald |
| |
|
|
"A recording truly worthy of celebration"
International Piano |
Programme
FANTASY AND VARIETY
Touchstones of nineteenth-century piano repertoire, Schumann’s
Fantasie, Op.17 and Brahms’ Variations and Fugue on a Theme by Handel,
Op.24 are ready reminders of the wide scope of Romantic piano music. Both
pieces are the work of composers in their mid-late twenties and well
reflect their differing approaches when in the first flush of genius.
While the Fantasie has Schumann giving full reign to caprice and fancy
with the odd nod to older forms of keyboard music, Brahms’ Variations
embrace the past wholeheartedly while developing into something quite
novel.
Schumann’s Fantasie began life in the summer of 1836 in the form of a
single movement composed as a lament at being forcibly parted from his
beloved Clara Wieck. At sixteen, nine years Schumann’s junior, Clara was
already a celebrated prodigy and well on her way to becoming one of the
great pianists of the age. Her ambitious father, discovering a secret
tryst between the pair, had her return Schumann’s letters, banned the
composer from entering the Wieck household, vilified and slandered him and
may even have threatened to shoot him. The remaining two movements of the
Fantasie were the direct result of Schumann’s desire to help Liszt in
his efforts to fund a monument to Beethoven in Bonn. His fervent
enthusiasm for the Beethoven appeal appears to have temporarily overridden
his melancholy as he collected the three movements, now known as ‘Ruins’,
‘Trophies’ and ‘Palms’, under the title, ‘Sonata for Beethoven’.
His plans included instructions to the publisher Kistner on how monies
might be raised for the monument through sales of the work, and even
concerned details such as the colour of the binding and design of the
title page. Kistner was not the only publisher who did not return Schumann’s
enthusiasm and it was only after numerous other titles for the ‘Sonata’
and its movements came and went that Breitkopf & Härtel eventually
published the work as Fantasie, Op.17 in 1839, over two years after its
completion.
The opening movement is a whirling, passionate dream of despair.
Schumann subsequently wrote to Clara that it was the product of “excessive
melancholy” and “the most passionate thing I have ever composed – a
deep lament for you”. Its early title, ‘Ruins’, tells its own story,
but was later replaced by a preface by Friedrich Schlegel:
Durch alle Töne tönet Im bunten Erdentraum Ein leiser Ton gezogen
Für den, der Heimlich lauschet.
(Through all the notes / In earth’s multi-coloured dreams / There
sounds one soft note / For the one who listens secretly).
The “soft note” has been interpreted as Schumann’s undying love
for Clara or indeed as representing Clara herself. Schumann was a great
lover of musical puzzles, ciphers and number symbolism and thus his output
abounds in quotations, acknowledged and unacknowledged, and any number of
coded references to Clara, friends and fellow composers. Who knows how
many of these are now lost to time? A quotation that revels in the dual
nature of the
Fantasie’s inspiration - Clara and Beethoven - appears in numerous
guises in the first movement. Taken from the final song of Beethoven’s
cycle, An die ferne Geliebte (To the Distant Beloved), the text of the
original encourages the distant beloved to reduce the distance by singing
the same songs as her lover.
Despite the depth of emotion directed at her in the opening movement,
it was the second movement that Clara held dearest. The ghost of Beethoven
is evident in the trills and dotted rhythms of its bold, triumphal march.
Clara wrote of hearing an “entire orchestra” in it and encouraged
Schumann more than once to orchestrate the march as an independent piece.
The coda, a bête noire to concert pianists even today, hurtles the
movement to a thrilling end. The finale is the work’s slow movement; a
serene, rapturous meditation which builds to a radiant climax and calmly
resigned close - one of Schumann’s most sublime moments.
Although now a venerable warhorse of the concert platform, neither the
composer nor the grateful dedicatee, Liszt, considered the Fantasie
suitable for public consumption, considering its home to be in rarefied
private circles where it might receive suitable appreciation. Liszt,
though a keen advocate, never performed it in public though he thought
enough of it to dedicate his own masterpiece, the Piano Sonata in B minor,
to Schumann in return, and never removed the Fantasie from his teaching
repertoire. Even Clara Schumann didn’t perform the work in public until
1866, ten years after her husband’s death.
By 29 November 1862, the Viennese public, at least, was certainly ready
and willing to hear the Fantasie in the concert hall. The 29 year-old
Brahms had arrived in Vienna from his native Hamburg less than three
months previously and the city took its hat off to him as he performed
Schumann’s masterpiece and one of his own making - the Variations and
Fugue on a Theme by Handel, Op.24. Although Schumann had welcomed Brahms
with open arms in 1853, instigated the publication of his earliest work
and broadcast his name and genius to the musical world, theirs was to be a
friendship occupying only the last three years of Schumann’s life.
Thereafter, it was Clara who became companion, confidante and artistic
ideal to the younger composer. She helped forge his career in both
critical and practical ways; with her knowledge of the industry and
through her influence in having his works programmed and performing the
piano works herself.
Just as Schumann was a man forging ahead, surrounded by colleagues
alive to the latest developments of the day, whether ephemeral or lasting,
so Brahms positioned himself as part of a long and certain lineage back to
Bach and beyond. For his time, he was remarkable for developing a deep
interest in music of the Renaissance and Baroque periods, amassing a fine
library of manuscripts and early print publications from all over Europe,
including the original 1733 edition of the Handel suite which contains the
theme for the Variations. His friends numbered the pre-eminent
musicologists of the era, including Chrysander, the great Handel expert
and Spitta, the distinguished Bach biographer. Brahms’ array of editing
projects included the Renaissance masters, Handel, Bach and, naturally,
Schumann.
It comes as little surprise then that Brahms was eexperimenting with Baroque forms prior to writing his Handel Variations, composing canons, gavottes, sarabandes, gigues, preludes and fugues. Rather than for publication, these were generally didactic exercises - opportunities to get beneath the skin of practices long neglected. The variation is one of the most ancient forms of all, present in music of all periods and type. In common with many other themes for sets of variations, the air Brahms chose is a simple, pleasant affair leaving plenty of room for multifarious mutations. Handel himself composed five variants of the theme, but Brahms takes the humble tune into another dimension entirely with his 25 variations and crowning fugue.
Broadly speaking, the work falls into four blocks: variations 1 – 8, 9 – 12, 14 – 17 and 18 – 25 with variation 13 acting as a central pivot, itself counterbalanced by the closing fugue. The variations constitute a remarkable exploration of pianistic textures, styles and gestures from the Baroque to the mid-Nineteenth Century. Aside from honouring Handel, Couperin and his French contemporaries are recalled in the Baroque stylings of the Siciliano dance (variation 19) and the so-called ‘Music Box’ variation (22) and Bach is to the fore most obviously in the fugal writing. Beethoven, too, is often present influencing through his own masterful Eroica and Diabelli variation sets, both of which end with climactic fugues. But this is not to imply that the piece is either simply pastiche or a musical reliquary. Everything is filtered through Brahms’ imagination and even the most Baroque sounding bars remain
experimenting with Baroque forms prior to writing his Handel Variations, composing canons, gavottes, sarabandes, gigues, preludes and fugues. Rather than for publication, these were generally didactic exercises - opportunities to get beneath the skin of practices long neglected. The variation is one of the most ancient forms of all, present in music of all periods and type. In common with many other themes for sets of variations, the air Brahms chose is a simple, pleasant affair leaving plenty of room for multifarious mutations. Handel himself composed five variants of the theme, but Brahms takes the humble tune into another dimension entirely with his 25 variations and crowning fugue.
|
|